Other campus: FDA: science, not politics (U. South Florida)

By The Oracle

(U-WIRE) TAMPA, Fla. – The Food and Drug Administration doesn’t want people having sex.

At least that’s the conclusion one arrives at, given the findings of a study released by the Government Accountability Office. The GAO is a nonpartisan branch of the government with the burden of watching other supposedly nonpartisan branches of the government. When investigating the FDA’s ruling on over-the-counter sales of the morning-after pill, the GAO found that “four aspects of (the) review processes were unusual” and that the process was atypical in comparison with other FDA decisions.

According to the FDA’s Web site, it is “a federal science-based law enforcement agency mandated to protect public health and safety.”

The findings have given credence to many detractors of the decision, who have claimed that the FDA was giving weight to the opinions of social conservatives that fear making the pill readily available will lead to an increase in sexually promiscuous activity and the number of sexually transmitted infections in the United States.

In skirting its mandated duties, the FDA has undermined its very existence. Why bother having a science-based regulatory body-approving drug if its rulings are subject to the court of public opinion?

Get The Daily Illini in your inbox!

  • Catch the latest on University of Illinois news, sports, and more. Delivered every weekday.
  • Stay up to date on all things Illini sports. Delivered every Monday.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Thank you for subscribing!

Was the FDA doing its job fully and properly, it would examine nations that have already approved the morning-after pill for over-the-counter sale and take into account both the effect it has had on their societies and measure the use among the population.

A study reported on by the Australian Associated Press found that many women who use the over-the-counter pill in that nation are in ongoing relationships. In both nations, the majority of women surveyed provided a common response for why they use the pill: broken condoms.

What this means, of course, is that they were already having regular sex.

The FDA has disapproved the widespread use of a pill that has been found safe for its users and which has been proven socially benign by countries sensible enough to invest in the idea – and all because of the fear, uncertainty and doubt of those who, by its very definition, it should ignore.

Staff Editorial

The Oracle (U. South Florida)