Remember race riot in Springfield

By Chelsea Fiddyment

This August marked the 100th anniversary of the race riot that occurred in Springfield. That itself may be a shocking statement. Few people even in the state’s capital know much about the two-day riot that occurred in their hometown in 1908, much less those outside the community. Probably fewer still are aware that, despite a low death toll, Springfield’s riot essentially led to the formation of the NAACP.

So what has Springfield done to raise awareness of the string of events which devastated the now-downtown area?

After 100 years, this year they erected informational markers denoting important locations during the rioting. Currently, there are weekly speaker panels discussing historical and cultural issues related to and stemming from the events of 1908. The Abraham Lincoln Presidential Library also hosts a small, temporary exhibit inside with scattered facts and photos during, after, and about the riot.

Sadly, even with these small efforts on the part of the city of Springfield, people have complained-not only complained, but argued against any commemoration at all. Yes, racism is alive and well.

Many people voiced complaints (especially on the State Journal-Register Web site, as the Internet gives voices to all people, especially obnoxious ones) that there were bigger riots to talk about (not in Springfield, however), that it’s depressing and annoying to continue to bring up the event, and that discussion of the riot would simply be the cause of further racial tension and division in the present.

Get The Daily Illini in your inbox!

  • Catch the latest on University of Illinois news, sports, and more. Delivered every weekday.
  • Stay up to date on all things Illini sports. Delivered every Monday.
Thank you for subscribing!

None of these is a legitimate reason to cease discussion about the Springfield riot. In fact, they create incentive for further, more in-depth conversation. No matter how much we complain or choose to ignore them, horrific injustices occurred in those two days.

The point of commemorating them isn’t to elicit guilt or apologies from anyone. It is to promote understanding between people, understanding of where and what we’ve developed from, and ultimately understanding how far we still have to go in the fight for equality.

In conjunction with people’s unwillingness to actively discuss the riot, another problem arises: the serious lack of information available. Upon visiting the exhibit hosted by Lincoln’s library, I found it unorganized and inconsistent in providing a full account of events of the riot. Many of the quotes used in the displays provided clarity, but were attributed to speakers from 1975. Again, it seems invalid to complain that the details and history of the riot are being shoved down your throat in the present when nobody has discussed it for 33 years.

What is it, exactly, that keeps us from talking about it? Even in an academic setting, the anniversary of the riot has not seemed to incite much discussion. The U of I home page offered a quick blurb from its “Minute With” professor, Clarence Lang, and nothing more. We are apparently so terrified of any missteps in a dialogue regarding racial historical issues (and, for that matter, just racial issues in general) that we opt instead to eliminate talk of them whatsoever.

I get the feeling that following this year, despite next year being the 100th anniversary of the formation of the NAACP, nothing will be left of this year’s efforts except the concrete markers and the mediocre amount of information they provide. The downtown walking tour that was offered this summer will likely be discontinued, due to the negative reception it has received from the community and the lack of attendance. The exhibit will vanish. And with 13 state historic sites already slated to close on October 1 due to lack of funds, it’s highly doubtful that the state will shell out the necessary green to host anything else.

Thus the lack of information will continue, unless we decide differently. Next year’s Lincoln Bicentennial could and should be used to enhance public knowledge of the two-day tragedy in 1908. After all, the riot came as such a shock in part because it took place in Lincoln’s honorary hometown. The ongoing interest in and celebration of Lincoln’s life should focus our attention on the fact that the issue of American racial equality, made mainstream by the events of the Civil War, has yet to be fully resolved.

Chelsea is a senior in English and music and is still living out of a suitcase, despite moving in a month ago.