UI sends Chief report to NCAA

By Courtney Linehan

The University sent a report Friday in response to a request from the NCAA that it and 30 other member institutions self evaluate their uses of logos, nicknames and mascots deriving from American-Indian terms.

The report came after the NCAA’s Minority Opportunities and Interests Committee requested a six-month investigation. The deadline to respond was Sunday.

Illinois sent the NCAA a 13-page report and 27 related documents, including the 2000 Dialogue on Chief Illiniwek report, documentation of two Chief-related lawsuits and copies of various Board of Trustees motions regarding the issue.

“We took it very seriously, and I think basically it afforded us an opportunity to review so much that’s already been done by this institution,” said Tom Hardy, executive director for University Relations.

In asking the 31 schools to complete self evaluations, the NCAA hoped to develop a better understanding of why schools use American-Indian imagery, said Gail Dent, NCAA associate director of public and media relations.

Get The Daily Illini in your inbox!

  • Catch the latest on University of Illinois news, sports, and more. Delivered every weekday.
  • Stay up to date on all things Illini sports. Delivered every Monday.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Thank you for subscribing!

“The NCAA requested that select schools in its membership complete the self evaluations as an additional resource to examine ongoing use of American-Indian imagery, which includes mascots, logos, behavior and nicknames,” Dent said.

Illinois’ report emphasized that the Chief Illiniwek symbol continues to be a topic of controversy on campus and that the Board of Trustees is working toward a consensus resolution to the issue.

The document detailed the main arguments in support and opposition of the use of the Chief Illiniwek symbol. It briefly summarized the history of the Illini name and how it is used around campus.

While the report emphasized that the University does not have a mascot, significant space was dedicated to discussing Chief Illiniwek, his role in the University environment and the debate surrounding him.

Hardy said the length to which the campus community has debated the Chief made it easy to assemble the information requested without doing additional research.

“So much input has come from every direction of those involved in the issue, and every point of view is represented, every action that has been taken is represented,” Hardy said. “I think it’s going to be a valuable resource for the NCAA, a valuable resource for our Board of Trustees as they move forward, and certainly for anybody else who wants to learn more about the issue.”

Illinois is not the only campus on which the school’s use of American-Indian imagery has been a hot topic. Schools such as University of North Dakota, UNC-Pembroke and Florida State have spent considerable time determining whether to continue the use of their mascots, logos and nicknames.

“At UND, our state board of higher education made the decision in 2000 that the name for UND athletics shall be the Fighting Sioux,” said Phil Harmeson, senior associate to the president at UND. He said UND spent nine months in 2000 completing a study on the use of the Fighting Sioux nickname and has done scientific surveys of student, faculty and community opinions about it.

“UND is light years ahead of other institutions in dealing with this,” Harmeson said.

Once the NCAA receives every school’s response, the information will be summarized and forwarded to the Minority Opportunities and Interests Committee, Dent said. It will then be sent to the Executive Subcommittee on Gender and Diversity Issues to make recommendations, and then the NCAA Executive Committee will review it at its August meeting.

Decisions about further action or recommendations to member institutions will be made in August at the earliest, Dent said.

“The Executive Committee has the authority to suggest individual recommendations, as well as broad recommendations to our membership,” Dent said.

Hardy said the University will continue to work toward achieving a consensus resolution while waiting to see what the NCAA finds.

“I think there’s still a fair amount of uncertainty about where this is all going to lead, and this institution and others, I’m sure, will be watching with interest where the NCAA goes from here,” he said.