British troop presence in Iraq to be cut in half by next spring

Anti-war protesters march along a central London street near the Houses of Parliament on Monday. Prime Minister Gordon Brown said Monday that Britain will withdraw nearly half of its troops from Iraq beginning spring of 2008. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, LEFTERIS PITARAKIS

AP

Anti-war protesters march along a central London street near the Houses of Parliament on Monday. Prime Minister Gordon Brown said Monday that Britain will withdraw nearly half of its troops from Iraq beginning spring of 2008. THE ASSOCIATED PRESS, LEFTERIS PITARAKIS

By David Stringer

LONDON – Britain will halve its remaining troop contingent in Iraq next spring, Prime Minister Gordon Brown announced Monday. A British official later said they could not guarantee that any troops would remain in Iraq by the end of 2008.

Brown, under fire for his decision not to call an election for this year, said Britain would lower troop levels to 2,500 by mid-2008 and re-deploy logistics staff to neighboring states. The British leader was clearly hoping the announcement would help boost his popularity among a public weary of the war.

Aides had stoked election rumors for weeks, particularly as lawmakers and activists gathered for a series of political party conferences. But Brown scrapped the plans Saturday as opinion polls suggested his early wave of public support had waned.

Brown told lawmakers Monday his Iraq plan follows the success of the U.S. troop increase this summer and efforts by Iraqis to drive suspected al-Qaida militants from havens in Anbar province, west of Baghdad.

He said decisions on further cuts would be made once the reduction was complete, rejecting a call from opposition lawmakers to set a timetable to withdraw all British forces.

Get The Daily Illini in your inbox!

  • Catch the latest on University of Illinois news, sports, and more. Delivered every weekday.
  • Stay up to date on all things Illini sports. Delivered every Monday.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Thank you for subscribing!

Officials said the latest troop cut would be complete by April and that a total withdrawal of forces would be among options considered then.

“At the point where we arrive at that number next year, we shall have a much clearer idea of what our policy is going to be,” a British official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the issue. “But certainly at this stage there’s no guarantee they’re going to be there beyond the end of (2008).”

The British presence in Iraq peaked with 46,000 troops during the March 2003 invasion. It was reduced to 18,000 that May, and 8,600 by the end of May 2004. This past May, there were about 5,500 British troops in Iraq.

Britain is already scaling back forces. By the year’s end, it will have 4,500 troops based mainly on the fringe of the southern city of Basra, where a power vacuum has exacerbated discord among rival Shiite groups.

Iraqi forces will take control of security in the southern province of Basra within two months, ending Britain’s combat role in the country, Brown said.

Some 500 British logistics and support staff will be moved outside Iraq but will remain in the Middle East to support the remaining troops, Brown said.

U.S. military officials are concerned that the reduced British presence in southern Iraq could open security gaps along routes to and from Kuwait.

The roadways are a lifeline for U.S. forces. And everything that the Americans can’t fly out of the country when they eventually leave must make the potentially dangerous road journey to Kuwait through Basra province.

Nevertheless, the Bush administration said it welcomed the British announcement.

“Moving to overwatch status is the desired outcome for all coalition forces in Iraq as the Iraqis continue to take over more security,” National Security Council spokesman Gordon Johndroe said.

Britain’s participation in the 2003 U.S.-led invasion – and the continuing presence of troops in Iraq – remains deeply unpopular. On Monday more than 2,000 people marched from London’s Trafalgar Square to Parliament to demand a complete withdrawal of British troops.

Brown was apparently hoping his decision to pull troops from Iraq would distance him from his predecessor Tony Blair, whose parliamentary majority was reduced in 2005 by voters angered over the war.

He also is seeking to recapture the opinion poll lead he had soon after taking office in June. He lost the lead last week after the main opposition Conservatives unveiled popular tax cut pledges.

Analysts said the erratic polls demonstrate that Britain remains unsure whom it wants as leader since Blair departed in June.

Brown may also have handed his rivals a potentially crucial weapon by casting himself as a chronic procrastinator in failing to hold an autumn poll.

The ex-Treasury chief is remembered for his caution over whether to challenge Blair for their party’s leadership in 1994, eventually standing aside for his longtime rival.

“The fact of the matter is I take responsibility. I take the blame. I take the decisions. If anything goes wrong, it comes back to me,” Brown said.