Staff editorial: Renewing the public’s trust

Illustration

Illustration

By Editorial Board

In Champaign, Martel Miller and Patrick Thompson have been charged with eavesdropping on police officers who were making routine traffic stops. The two men are co-founders of a group called Citizen’s Watch, whose goal is to videotape and monitor local police. According to police, what is at issue is the audio content of the videotapes, rather than the video itself.

Eavesdropping laws are in place to protect the privacy of citizens, but Illinois law is unclear about what conversations are deemed private and also, which types are illegal. We believe the defendants are in the right, and hopefully this case could help make the law clearer.

Moreover, the police perform a public service, and it doesn’t make sense for them to be protective of their on-duty actions.

Miller and Thompson were planning to include the footage in a documentary comparing and contrasting police treatment of different racial and ethnic groups. It was meant for educational purposes, and was developed for public television.

Before filming began, the two men notified police, the city and the mayor of their project. However, they did not inform them of the methods, specifically videotaping, that they would be using to monitor law-enforcement officers.

Get The Daily Illini in your inbox!

  • Catch the latest on University of Illinois news, sports, and more. Delivered every weekday.
  • Stay up to date on all things Illini sports. Delivered every Monday.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Thank you for subscribing!

And while we understand the reaction police would have to observers who might distort or misrepresent their actions, the police should have to understand that transparency and accountability for their actions as public protectors and state employees is crucial.

It shouldn’t matter whether on-duty police are being observed or monitored. The police should be expected to act as professional and ethical as possible regardless of who’s watching.

Monitoring public servants and officials should not be discouraged. By charging these men with eavesdropping, the city sends a devastating message that it’s not OK for community programs, such as Neighborhood Watch, to enforce their own checks and balances.

Rather than react negatively to citizens who wish to independently monitor law enforcement, the police should drop these charges and address the issues that motivated these men to monitor them in the first place. Maintaining the goodwill of communities is important. This is an opportunity for the police to renew the public’s trust.