With the 2024 election nearly a year away, the American political landscape is once again gearing up for a spectacle that has become an integral part of our democratic process: presidential debates. However, recent developments suggest that this essential tradition is under threat, with both major parties seemingly shying away from this exchange of ideas.
In a democracy that prides itself on transparency and open dialogue, the absence of mandatory participation in presidential debates undermines the very principles we hold dear.
In both Republican primary debates, one prominent figure was notably absent: former President Donald Trump. With a commanding lead over his rivals, Trump’s absence may be seen by some as a strategic move. However, this raises the important question of whether presidential candidates should be required to attend debates.
Presidential debates are not just a forum for candidates to exchange barbs and tout their accomplishments; they are a cornerstone of our democracy, allowing voters to assess candidates’ policy positions, leadership abilities and their readiness for the highest office in the land.
The decision to skip debates, as taken by Trump, sends a concerning message that a candidate believes they are entitled to the nomination without needing to engage in substantive discourse. This attitude undermines the democratic process by depriving voters of the opportunity to make informed choices based on a comprehensive understanding of each candidate’s platform.
Get The Daily Illini in your inbox!
The situation is not confined to the Republican side. On the Democratic front, President Joe Biden has argued against participating in primary debates, citing the precedent that incumbents do not engage in such contests. While this may seem like a reasonable argument, it ignores the fact that democracy thrives on competition, diversity of thought and the exchange of ideas.
What good is preaching about preserving democracy if you yourself are taking steps to undermine it?
Biden, like any other candidate, should be willing to defend his ideas and policies in front of voters and challengers. RFK Jr. and Marianne Williamson, among others, have stepped up to challenge his candidacy.
By refusing to participate in debates, the president is effectively shutting down opportunities for these challengers to present their ideas and give voters a meaningful choice.
Presidential debates are not just a privilege for the candidates, but a right for the voters. A fair and open primary election is the bedrock of a healthy democracy. It ensures that all candidates, regardless of their standing, have a platform to make their case, and voters have access to all the information they need to make informed decisions.
Democracy is not a spectator sport. It requires active participation, engagement and dialogue. When candidates opt out of debates, they are effectively disenfranchising the electorate by denying them the opportunity to see a thorough examination of each candidate’s ideas and qualifications.
Alexander is a graduate student in Media.
